Thursday, March 7, 2013

A Goodbye to Cursive Writing

I recently heard that cursive writing is no longer a requirement here in Kentucky.  As in, my kids may not be taught to write in cursive by our public school system. 

So.  Okay.  Wait.  What? 

The logic that was to be the end of cursive hand writing had something to do with a notion that no other countries learn to write in two forms like we do: print and cursive.  So, is that true?  Are we (the USA) the only folks on Earth who learn to write in two formats?  Apparently not.  According to Wikipedia, many countries have a cursive form of their written language. 

Hmmm, I find that fact very interesting, don't you?

Another argument for the demise of cursive writing is that everything is created in print.  But, that's simply not true.  Some of the most important documents in the United States are written in cursive.  If we no longer teach our children to write and read cursive, who will be left to read the Constitution and other documents created by the founders of our country?  What a sad future we have ahead of us.

Here are a few other interesting things I read as I researched this topic:
  • Cursive is often believed to be faster than printing
  • Cursive may be required to make legal documents official
  • In many countries, children are FIRST taught to write and read in cursive
So, how many countries use the Roman Alphabet? According to the map on Wiki, most of the world uses the Roman Alphabet.  I'm going to make an educated guess that most countries learn, teach, and use both the print and cursive versions of the Roman Alphabet. Why would the USA want to be the only one to eliminate cursive?  It just makes zero sense. 

I think it's fair to say that we will be short-changing our children when cursive is fully eliminated from our classrooms.  Parents, we need to start paying attention to these things.  I can't speak for everyone, but I don't want my kids to be partially illiterate.  Eliminating cursive from our curriculum is a huge mistake.

6 comments:

  1. Allie is being taught cursive the old Palmer method. She is in 3rd. However my nephew who just enlisted had to PRACTICE his signature the night before because it had been 'so long' since he used cursive! I agree with you, a horrid idea whomever came up with it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i haven't heard anything about the palmer method, but i guess i better get familiar since it seems like it'll be up to me to teach my kids cursive! i think it's ok to print if that's your pref, but i just think everyone needs to be able to read it and write because at some point it's going to be a neccesity! just like your nephew who enlisted, who i hope is doing well?

      Delete
  2. Hm, I am not sure about what is taught in schools today but when I went to school we were taught both cursive and print, if I remember correctly. I would find it strange, too, if that were changed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i'm glad to know that i'm not the only one who thought it was strange to learn that cursive is a thing of the past. like i said, learning it can't make you less intelligent!

      Delete
  3. Handwriting matters ... But does cursive matter?
    Research shows: the fastest and most legible handwriters join only some letters, not all of them: making the easiest joins, skipping the rest, and using print-like shapes for those letters whose cursive and printed shapes disagree. (Citations appear below.)

    It may not be coincidence that this way of writing cursive — a semi-joined, print-like way — is what I've seen used in the handwriting classrooms and textbooks of many European and English-speaking countries that use the Roman alphabet. (The example I usually quote is Finland, because that nation — semi-joined writing and all — ranks #1 in worldwide comparisons of students' educational achievement.)

    When following the rules doesn't work as well as breaking them, it’s time to re-write and upgrade the rules. The discontinuance of cursive offers a great opportunity to learn from folks like the Finns: to teach some better-functioning form of handwriting that is actually closer to what the fastest, clearest handwriters do anyway. (There are indeed USA-published textbooks and curricula teaching handwriting this way. Conventional cursive and printing are not the only kinds of handwriting in our alphabet.)

    Reading cursive still matters immensely — this takes just 30 to 60 minutes to learn, and can be taught to a five- or six-year-old if the child knows how to read. The value of reading cursive is therefore no justification for writing it.

    Remember, too: whatever your elementary school teacher may have been told by her elementary school teacher, cursive signatures have no special legal validity over signatures written in any other way. (Don't take my word for this: talk to any attorney.)



    CITATIONS:

    /1/ Steve Graham, Virginia Berninger, and Naomi Weintraub.
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HANDWRITING STYLE AND SPEED AND LEGIBILITY.
    1998: on-line at http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/27542168.pdf

    and

    /2/ Steve Graham, Virginia Berninger, Naomi Weintraub, and William Schafer.
    DEVELOPMENT OF HANDWRITING SPEED AND LEGIBILITY IN GRADES 1-9.
    1998: on-line at http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/27542188.pdf

    (NOTE: there are actually handwriting programs that teach this way.
    Shouldn't there be more of them?)




    Yours for better letters,



    Kate Gladstone
    Handwriting Repair/Handwriting That Works
    and the World Handwriting Contest
    http://www.HandwritingThatWorks.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wrote a followup to this post over on Take It or Leave It. here's the link: http://takeitorleaveit96.blogspot.com/2013/06/see-i-told-you-cursive-is-important.html

    ReplyDelete